*
BULLETIN : 8
Another Tale
from Two Cities. Part One: South Africa
Eyes Glued
to the Sky
I have seen the clouds
accumulate and have heard the rumbles of thunder for a very long time.
The stillness of the air and the quietness, sometimes confusing, as people
moved to and fro, like ants preparing for the winter. The flashes of lightning
reflected on false smiles and the laughter, like chirps from birds, warning
that there was a snake deep down under in the belly of society.
Now that the rains
have fallen and tears have washed away some of our make-up, and trees
and buildings have been destroyed, we have to swiftly move to erect the
relevant movements. Yes, use some of these trees to build bridges, and
some to erect structures so as to have a shelter.
They came from far
and wide to be with their fellow comrades in poverty - the majority really
concerned about the movement. Some were there for the very first time
and hungry for information and development; others saturated by hate and
disgusted by the misuse and abuse of capacities and resources. This was
all evident in the debates, the sarcasm, in the embarrassing propaganda
spat out by leaders and members alike.
The encouraging thing
was that people wanted to come out of this Imbiso having been heard. It
reminded me of mass meetings some years ago in Piesang River, just that
there were no guns this time around. The atmosphere was high. The singing
and ululating reminded me of days gone by when the Federation was still
very active. People had come to this meeting to make a mark.
The leadership, feeling
threatened and not sure of the outcome, decided to defend itself, (a mistake),
to challenge members (also a mistake), pit members against one another
(yet another mistake), but also to admit – directly and indirectly
- that they are really weak at this moment.
The meeting explained
also why we don’t have as many exchanges anymore. It also explained
why the movement no more talks about people and development.
The focus was on the structure, on things that do not make a difference
to poor people’s lives:
1. Group of 3
2. Decision making
3. Management
4. PD Board
5. Individuals
Nothing was mentioned
about our developments, savings, enumerations, community based training
etc. All the contentious issues were about control and not about how to
refocus on our struggles, our rights and our poverty. To make things more
painful we were hosted in Thinasonke - by a community dying for support
- and I am just wondering how much damage was done to their hope for tomorrow.
And yet --- now that
we know the situation, I am confident that it will be easier to tackle
that task at hand. It is always good to know what you are dealing with.
The regions which
differed in the proceedings were only two. In fact I don t think it is
fair to say regions but just the leaders of those 2 regions – leaders
with track records of authoritarianism and intolerance. Well, what can
we say? They will say they have a right to differ.
It will be very interesting
to look at the cause of these differences.
(a) Because we are
not doing anything practical on the ground, eg. House construction, land
acquisition enumerations to understand our situation etc. People are frustrated.
(b) Because the emphasis is not on network building and savings. The leaders
focus elsewhere.
(c) Because money is being dangled openly to certain leaders in the National
leadership. You can be sure that sparks are going to fly.
(d) Certain People’s Dialogue staff members are positioning themselves
for power, and lying to themselves that they have the vision and the capacity
to manage this complex and difficult process.
Patrick Magebhula
|